
Completing Tillich: From Sacred Gesture to Participatory Structure
The psyche as sacrament, not merely seeker
Vervaeke argues that Tillich's vision of a god beyond theism was prophetic but empty, and that filling it requires redefining the sacred as an emergent, self-organizing process in which the psyche participates not as a passive knower but as a living sacrament.
The Translation
AI-assisted summaryFamiliar terms
Vervaeke's engagement with Tillich centers on a diagnosis: Tillich's concept of the god beyond the god of theism was genuinely prophetic but remained structurally empty. Tillich correctly identified that theism had severed ultimate concern from what is ultimately real, and he called for an Ontological leap as radical as the one from Bronze Age polytheism to classical theism. But the call lacked the Ontological and epistemological machinery to make it actionable. Vervaeke, in collaboration with Gregg Henriques, aims to supply precisely that machinery.
The pivotal move is a reinterpretation of Tillich's descriptor "inexhaustible" as applied to the sacred. Vervaeke strips this term of its Newtonian, purely quantitative resonance — the sacred is not inexhaustible because it is infinitely extended — and regrounds it in a framework of Emergence and emanation. The sacred, on this account, is a living, self-organizing, dynamically unfolding process whose depth is generative rather than merely extensive. This shifts the sacred from a static object of contemplation to an ongoing participatory reality.
The deeper claim is about structural conformity between psyche and Cosmos. Intelligence and intelligibility are not accidentally correlated but mutually constitutive — the fundamental grammar of cognition and the fundamental grammar of reality are isomorphic in a non-trivial sense. This means the psyche is not merely an epistemic instrument directed at the sacred but a participatory Symbol, a sacrament, that makes the sacred present through its very operation. Vervaeke argues that without this reconceptualization — without grounding participation in a robust ontology of Emergence — no ecological narrative, no artistic practice, and no ethical exhortation will generate the depth of commitment and sacrifice that the current civilizational crisis requires.